--Otherwise, Google’s digital wall will make Hillary Clinton inevitable as next president

By Judi McLeod, with permission of the author

No matter how hard they try to force it into reality, Google will never make ‘Crooked Hillary’ straight.

As people who have tried to get items removed from the world’s largest search engine already know, high-handed Google “is forever”. Unfortunately so too are the lies that social media is helping Hillary Rodham Clinton cover.

Like the president who got there before it was “my turn”, there’s nothing real about Hillary Clinton, save for her ongoing outrageous lies. Just like Obama, Hillary Clinton is a completely re-laundered and re-cycled digitally social media-manufactured persona.

You’d think from the whining of the far left, the "in-the-tank-with-the-Dems" GOP and the embittered #Nevertrump that Election 2016 was in the bag for Donald J. Trump. But most tragically for America -- and the Western world that depends on a stable US -- Google’s got it in the bag for Hillary Clinton.

Here are just some of the social-media posts which detail this  nefarious Goolgle conspiracy:

“An explosive report released Thursday suggests that Google manipulated its search engine to boost Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton by burying unflattering stories about her.” (Washington Times, June 9, 2016)

A video -- posted by 'SourceFed", a news and pop-culture website, accused Google of attempting to boost secretly Mrs. Clinton’s candidacy: “'Thanks to the help of our editor Spencer Reed, SourceFed has discovered that Google has been actively altering search recommendations in favor of Hillary Clinton’s campaign so quietly that we were unable to see it for what it was until today,' said SourceFed’s Matt Lieberman in the video."

“For example," he continued, "when typing 'Hillary Clinton cri,' Google’s auto-complete function brings up as its top choice 'Hillary Clinton crime reform,'  even though competing search engines Bing and Yahoo show the most popular search topics are 'Hillary Clinton criminal charges' and 'Hillary Clinton crime'.”

How can it be that the Google-Hillary exposé only became known on Thursday  -- considering that Clinton entered the presidential race, 14 months ago on April 12, 2015, as what Canada Free Press called: ‘The Google President’.

The deal Google made with Clinton follows the previous deal she made with Obama to wait her turn for the 2016 election made way back in 2008.

Looks like Google was doing evil even as it was coming up with its hypocritical ‘Do No Evil’ motto.

One has only to see the response to Thursday’s ‘exposé’ to see how the world’s largest search engine can finesse ‘the truth’ and in so doing, mastermind the ultimate outcome of November’s presidential election.

Google the story yourself.

The real problem?

Where Google is leading America is particularly critical for the many today who are too young to know much about Clinton’s 40-year history in politics.

Many of the millennials Bernie Sanders will casually throw Clinton’s way at the DNC weren’t around when Clinton inserted herself as co-president during her husband’s tenure in the Oval Office.

Google has seen to it that anyone looking for the real Hillary Clinton has to go waaaay back for anyone seriously interested in searching her shady past.

Not many saw this coming, particularly the useless GOP, and not even the campaign teams of all 17 contenders for Republican nomination.

The truth is that it wasn’t only last Thursday that the truth came out.

Regardless, when Hillary Clinton signed her nomination papers on April 12, 2015, she had already stepped into the 2016 presidential race as the ‘Google President’.

Remember our original prediction: “Get ready for a 2016 presidential campaign utterly controlled by a Google chokehold. (Canada Free Press, April 9, 2015):

“Long a public relations conspiracy in the making, the digital behemoth whose hypocritical motto is ‘Do No Evil’ seeks to keep the presidency an airtight Democrat one.

“For the perpetually gullible ready to slap a smiley face on the 2016 presidential campaign:

“Google, to which a majority of the Internet surfing world is already addicted—40,000 search queries every second on average, 3.5 billion searches per day and 1.2 trillion searches per year worldwide—has come out of the woodwork claiming the world’s only monopoly on the Truth...

“Overnight an unsuspecting net surfing society has become the David, in a digital David & Goliath Battle taking it deeper into the dark.

“Difficult as it already is, getting the truth to the masses will be all but impossible thanks to Google algorithm tricks. Dependable conservative sites -- like Breitbart, NewsMax, American Thinker, Gateway Pundit and the like -- will have to find new strategies to bypass Google and come up with a solution that maybe doesn’t exist.

“Unscathed by her email scandal, ‘Don’t-call-her-Hillary’ Rodham Clinton has hired herself a longtime Google executive -- to oversee her seemingly inevitable presidential campaign’s technology, to build new ways for her to engage with voters by drawing on the tech giant that arrogantly claims to have a monopoly on Truth.”

But now back to the current malaise: The only change since last April is that Facebook has now joined Google in suppressing the news of Conservative websites.

Finding the escape hatch from Obama’s eight-year-long deliberate destruction of America is no longer an option.

This is one political tsunami from which there seems to be no recovery.

The situation is as dire for America now as it was when the Democrats brought an America-hating Barack Obama into power back in 2008.

Meanwhile, there’s a wall far more prohibitive than the temporary one suggested by Donald J. Trump to protect America’s southern border: It’s the fail-proof wall that Google has thrown up to keep anyone other than Hillary Clinton from becoming America’s 45th.

It’s no lie that if Donald Trump wants to be elected, he must find a way to get past the Google wall.


Judi McLeod is an award-winning journalist with 30 years’ experience in the print media. A former Toronto Sun columnist, she also worked for the Kingston Whig Standard. Her work has appeared on Rush Limbaugh, Newsmax.com, Drudge Report, Foxnews.com, and Glenn Beck.

Judi can be emailed at: judi@canadafreepress.com

--The West is most assuredly at war with Islam. This is not a religious war. This is a war between two diametrically opposed ethical systems that cannot live together.
By Diane Weber Bederman, dosage with permission of the author

Obama has been busy implementing a world-view which resonates with a variety of Marxist philosophy called Cultural Marxism. “Critics have seen Cultural Marxism and its influence as an important cause of political correctness and as an important cause of a perceived decline of humanities, prescription social sciences, tadalafil culture, and civilization in the Western world. Cultural Marxists often try to remove these inequalities by more or less subtle manipulation and censorship of culture.”

He’s demeaning the West, opening America to values that will destroy her, and at the same time elevating a far different culture: Islam, which has an ethic that’s anathema to the West. He said in his speech of February 2016 to the Baltimore Islamic Society: “For more than a thousand years, people have been drawn to Islam’s message of peace. And the very word itself, Islam, comes from salam—peace. The standard greeting is as-salamu alaykum—peace be upon you. And like so many faiths, Islam is rooted in a commitment to compassion and mercy and justice and charity. Whoever wants to enter paradise, the Prophet Muhammad taught, “let him treat people the way he would love to be treated.”

There is a problem with this statement. The meaning of “Peace” in Islam is not the same as the meaning of peace in the West. In Islam there will be peace when all the world accepts Allah and Sharia law. Modern-day Islamic scholar, Ibrahim Sulaiman, says submission and peace can be very different concepts, even if a form of peace is often brought about through forcing others into submission. “Jihad is not inhumane, despite its necessary violence and bloodshed, its ultimate desire is peace which is protected and enhanced by the rule of law.” Armed responses are only permitted when all peaceful possibilities have failed. And once armed resistance begins it doesn’t stop “until the war lays down its burden” as Allah has mentioned in the Qur’an 47.

For a man who considers himself worldly, how is it that he is not aware of this different meaning? Or is he?

Obama also said “Groups like al Qaeda and ISIL, they’re not the first extremists in history to misuse God’s name. We’ve seen it before, across faiths. But right now, there is an organized extremist element that draws selectively from Islamic texts, twists them in an attempt to justify their killing and their terror. They combine it with false claims that America and the West are at war with Islam… First, at a time when others are trying to divide us along lines of religion or sect, we have to reaffirm that most fundamental of truths: We are all God’s children. We’re all born equal, with inherent dignity.”

I fear this President is hiding from, or distorting, the facts on the ground in order to promote cultural relativism. The West is most assuredly at war with Islam. This is not a religious war. This is a war between two diametrically opposed ethical systems that cannot live together. Islam does not say that we are all born equal, with inherent dignity as is stated in the Judeo/Christian ethic that underpins America and the West. Islam is a type of caste system. It treats women like chattel. Islam teaches that those who believe in Islam are superior to others-Jews and Christians-who are viewed as lesser-than-dhimmis. In the times of Mohammed, Jews and Christians were singled out. And so it remains, today.

“Sharia law was put into place and the Christian dhimmis continued to have their “protected” status as People of the Book who lived under the Sharia law. The dhimmi paid heavy taxes, could not testify in court, hold a position of authority over Muslims and was humiliated by social rules. A dhimmi had to step aside for the Muslim, offer him his seat, could not carry a weapon and defer to a Muslim in every way. In all matters of society the dhimmi had to yield to the Muslim. Over the centuries, the degradation, lack of rights and the dhimmi tax caused the Christian to convert. It is the Sharia that destroys the dhimmis.”

Jews are forbidden from living in Muslim countries. In 1948, after five Arab/Muslim countries tried to annihilate the nascent state of Israel, 850,000 Jews living for more than 2000 years in the Muslim countries were exiled.

Where, President Obama, is that foundational belief of tolerance, inclusion, accommodation and inherent dignity for all?

Does President Obama believe that Muslims coming to America leave their beliefs of superiority behind? Their lack of tolerance and inclusion? Does he believe that Imams trained outside of America don’t preach these values in America?

Only one who believes in and promotes cultural relativism could have these views. And the rest of his foreign policy speaks even louder to cultural relativism. If he is going to prove that all cultures are equal he must elevate other cultures while demeaning America. Under Obama’s presidency America has diminished in the eyes of the world; exacerbated by his apologizing for America’s actions.

In 2009, “Mr.” Obama told the French (the French!) that America ‘has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive’ toward Europe. In Prague, he said America has ‘a moral responsibility to act’ on arms control because only the U.S. had ‘used a nuclear weapon.’ In London, he said that decisions about the world financial system were no longer made by ‘just Roosevelt and Churchill sitting in a room with a brandy’—as if that were a bad thing. And in Latin America, he said the U.S. had not “pursued and sustained engagement with our neighbors” because we “failed to see that our own progress is tied directly to progress throughout the Americas.”

According to Black “The high points of his foreign policy have been allowing the Western alliance to atrophy; failure to render any assistance to Ukraine, abruptly departing Iraq and ensuring its disintegration and the near-capture of Baghdad by Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, drawing a ‘red line’ against the Assad regime in Syria gassing its own civil population and then abdicating military command to Congress, and dropping the issue into the inhospitable lap of Russia. His solemn pledge to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear military power evolved into a green light for Iran to put nuclear warheads on its missiles in 10 years… American irresolution has been the chief cause of an immense humanitarian crisis.”

That humanitarian crisis has led to the movement of hundreds of thousands of Muslims into Europe and now Canada and America, many of whom, rather than integrating, are making demands of their new countries. According to journalist Soeren Kern “Asylum seekers are increasingly using tactics such as hunger strikes, lawsuits and threats of violence in efforts to force German authorities to comply with an ever-growing list of demands.”

And let us not forget Obama’s shabby, disrespectful treatment of Israel, the people and the country, that for 3500 years gave the west the ethic that underpins democracy, now the only Jewish state, 1/19th the size of California, surrounded by 22 hostile Arab/Islamic dictatorships, 640 times her size.

It is one of disdain.

The former Archbishop of Canterbury, Lord Carey of Clifton, lamented: “For too long we have been self-conscious and even ashamed about British identity. By embracing multiculturalism and the idea that every culture and belief is of equal value, we have betrayed our own traditions of welcoming strangers to our shore. Multiculturalism . . . has led to [honor] killings . . . and Sharia law.” (emphasis mine)

I suggest that under Obama, America, too, has betrayed her own traditions.






By Murray Soupcoff

All right folks, cost the die has been cast: it’s "The Donald" versus "Crooked Hillary" in the November U.S. presidential election (barring last-minute criminal charges against Mrs. Clinton, who -- if elected -- would be the first American president needing to pardon herself).

However, in my opinion, if America’s would-be American Queen is somehow elected President in November, the United States could be endure yet another disastrous economic recession -- even though the Obama years’ many economic setbacks still haven’t dissipated (including annual miniscule 0.5% GDP growth, a real-world 17% unemployment rate, as well as record unemployment among young black males)

Why do I make this damning assertion against the Democrats’ alleged girl wonder?

Well, for one thing, because American feminists’ dream candidate has already promised -- if she is elected president – to call on her husband Bill’s supposed economic savvy to guide her in making major economic decisions (so long as he doesn’t hire Monica Lewinsky as an aide).

Of course, the mainstream media’s constant spin -- since Mr. Clinton left office -- has been that his enlightened leadership propelled America into a time of economic growth and prosperity.

But did he really?

In fact, America’s most notorious Presidential cigar-wielding adulterer really owed his mainstream-media image -- as America’s economic savior – to a series of disastrous economic initiatives that ultimately boomeranged during the term of President George H.W. Bush.

And that’s notwithstanding Bush’s own proliferate overspending, to win the votes of liberal Americans who still continued to vote for the Democrat opposition.

So where did the Arkansas wonder screw up, in his drive to win over avaricious American voters?

Well for one thing, he insisted that every American had a right to his or her own home – no matter how economically-deprived their circumstances.

So with the assistance of Barney Frank, Mr. Clinton  helped mortgage lenders come up with ever more “creative” mortgage initiatives to permit almost any US. citizen – no matter how poor -- buy his or her own home.

The result?

A pseudo housing boom that had positive impacts on the rest of the American economy.

After all, building more homes generated a demand for more materials to construct and furnish those houses. And it meant more jobs not only in construction but in manufacturing too (e.g., roofing, or furniture for new homes).

A virtuous feedback loop of one spending commitment leading to another and then another, etc.

And that meant more jobs in various construction and manufacturing related industries, resulting in more spending money for workers employed in those jobs.

Of course, the American economy launched into full gear; and what ultimately turned out to be the myth -- of America’s presidential economic savior -- was born.

“The myth” you angrily ask, especially if you’re a devoted Clinton supporter.

Well, yes, that’s exactly what it was.

Because five to 7 years later, millions of Americans who were the beneficiaries of those creatively-crafted mortgages (thanks to the now notorious derivative swaps dreamed up by recently-graduated nerds employed by American banks) discovered that the payments increased beyond their ability to pay.

The truth & consequences?

Millions of foreclosures and bankruptcies which crashed the housing market and every other related market.

And not only were millions of houses lost, but millions of jobs were also lost and the nation’s economy tanked

All, unfortunately, during the term of George H.W. Bush,


The lesson learned from all of the above?

America cannot afford another Clinton as president – especially if she (as promised) appoints her husband as her number-one economic advisor!

Nuff said on this subject matter, I would think.

Proudly powered by WordPress   Premium Style Theme by www.gopiplus.com